Table. 3.

Association between the SRH and influenza vaccination

Characteristics SRH Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Total
Good 0.821 (0.699–0.965)* 0.842 (0.713–0.995)* 0.844 (0.711–1.022)
Moderate 0.863 (0.744–1.003) 0.857 (0.735–0.999)* 0.871 (0.741–1.023)
Poor 1 1 1
Sex: Male
Good 1.094 (0.846–1.415) 1.040 (0.795–1.361) 0.977 (0.739–1.292)
Moderate 1.139 (0.883–1.470) 1.062 (0.817–1.382) 1.043 (0.794–1.375)
Poor 1 1 1
Sex: Female
Good 0.677 (0.550–0.832)* 0.730 (0.590–0.905)* 0.759 (0.606–0.950)*
Moderate 0.727 (0.603–0.876)* 0.749 (0.619–0.906)* 0.772 (0.632–0.942)*
Poor 1 1 1
Age: 19–39 y
Good 1.060 (0.763–1.474) 1.025 (0.723–1.454) 0.901 (0.624–1.302)
Moderate 1.092 (0.791–1.508) 0.986 (0.705–1.379) 0.910 (0.639–1.297)
Poor 1 1 1
Age: 40–64 y
Good 0.715 (0.571–0.895)* 0.822 (0.649–1.041) 0.822 (0.649–1.041)
Moderate 0.758 (0.625–0.918)* 0.851 (0.695–1.043) 0.851 (0.695–1.043)
Poor 1 1 1
Age: ≥65 y
Good 0.784 (0.570–1.079) 0.792 (0.569–1.104) 0.859 (0.601–1.226)
Moderate 0.892 (0.655–1.216) 0.898 (0.658–1.227) 0.963 (0.692–1.340)
Poor 1 1 1

Values are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

SRH, self-reported health status.

The first model (Model 1) was adjusted for age or sex or both. The second model (Model 2) was additionally adjusted for education, income, living area, and marital status. The third model (Model 3) was additionally adjusted for smoking, drinking, regular exercise, and comorbidity.

*P-value was obtained by multiple logistic regression analysis; P<0.05.

Korean J Fam Pract 2021;11:247~255 https://doi.org/10.21215/kjfp.2021.11.4.247
© KJFP