Relationship between urine cotinine level and dysglycemia in secondhand smoking group
| Urine cotinine quintile group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st (n=213) |
2nd (n=219) |
3rd (n=221) |
4th (n=224) |
5th (n=226) |
|
| HbA1c | |||||
| Unadjusted | 1 | 0.848 (0.414, 0.570–1.260) | 0.944 (0.774, 0.638–1.397) | 1.058 (0.774, 0.718–1.560) | 1.043 (0.830, 0.708–1.537) |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.888 (0.594, 0.573–1.375) | 0.901 (0.636, 0.585–1.387) | 0.985 (0.945, 0.643–1.508) | 1.091 (0.691, 0.711–1.674) |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.336 (0.248, 0.818–2.183) | 1.043 (0.866, 0.639–1.703) | 1.037 (0.884, 0.635–1.693) | 1.348 (0.243, 0.816–2.225) |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.501 (0.112, 0.910–2.476) | 1.147 (0.588, 0.697–1.888) | 1.088 (0.740, 0.663–1.785) | 1.418 (0.182, 0.849–2.370) |
| Fasting blood glucose | |||||
| Unadjusted | 1 | 1.240 (0.298, 0.827–1.860) | 1.575 (0.026, 1.057–2.348) | 1.659 (0.012, 1.116–2.468) | 1.490 (0.049, 1.001–2.219) |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.258 (0.311, 0.807–1.959) | 1.507 (0.064, 0.976–2.328) | 1.585 (0.035, 1.032–2.435) | 1.550 (0.047, 1.006–2.389) |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.512 (0.101, 0.922–2.480) | 1.583 (0.063, 0.975–2.572) | 1.546 (0.079, 0.951–2.512) | 1.653 (0.047, 1.006–2.717) |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.620 (0.063, 0.973–2.696) | 1.700 (0.036, 1.034–2.793) | 1.677 (0.040, 1.023–2.747) | 1.915 (0.013, 1.149–3.190) |
Values are presenteted for odds ratio (P-value, 95% confidence interval) for dysglycemia.
a1st quintile group was reference group.
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex. Model 2 was adjusted for variables of model 1 plus alcohol intake, physical activity, daily energy intake, central obesity, overweight. Model 3 was adjusted for variables of model 2 plus education, income.