Korean J Fam Pract. 2018; 8(6): 935-939  https://doi.org/10.21215/kjfp.2018.8.6.935
A Survey on the Recognition of Family Doctor Registration Program of Healthcare Workers in a General Hospital in Seoul
Mina Cho, Soshin Kye*, Juhyun Lee, Sejin Oh, Yeonhee Kim, Hankyu Choi, Kichul Kim, Kyuha Lee
Department of Family Medicine, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Soshin Kye
Tel: +82-2-3400-1395, Fax: +82-2-3400-1366
E-mail: soskye@police.go.kr
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-6866
Received: July 26, 2017; Accepted: August 7, 2017; Published online: December 20, 2018.
© The Korean Academy of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: The need for family doctor registration programs (FDRPs) is constantly rising in order to reinforce primary healthcare. This study involved a questionnaire for healthcare workers to survey their recognition of FDRPs.
Methods: In total, 315 healthcare workers were surveyed using structured self-reporting questionnaires from October 2016 to December 2016. The questionnaire was designed to survey the respondents on the following areas: general characteristics, registration of FDRPs, and the influence of FDRPs.
Results: About 69.8% of respondents replied that they would enroll in an FDRP. In addition, the respondents showed a generally positive assessment of the impact of FDRPs on the healthcare system.
Conclusion: Additional studies should be designed in order to strengthen the positioning of clinics and to provide solutions against negative opinions about FDRPs.
Keywords: Physicians, Family; Healthcare System; Health Personnel; Primary Health Care
  1. Bong SW, Kim TH, Kim SS, Kim YS. An interview survey on opinions concerning the necessity for family doctor registration program and its major services. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2006; 27: 370-5.
  2. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health care quality review : assessment and recommendations Korea [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2012. [cited 2016 Sep 2].
  3. Lee HR, Chung ES, Moon YS, Lee DC, Shim JY. The effect of family registration program. J Korea Acad Fam Med 1996; 17: 761-74.
  4. Huh BY, Kim CH, Park TJ, Lee KY, Cho BL, Kim HJ. Development and evaluation of home doctor registration program. J Korea Acad Fam Med. 1998;19: 801-10.
  5. Seo HG, Kang JH, Kim CH, Kim SW. A telephone survey on the opinions about family doctor. Korean J Prev Med 1998; 31: 310-22.
  6. Cho HJ, Shim JY, Lee HR, Lee SH. What do Korean people think of family doctor registration program? J Korean Acad Fam Med 2002; 23: 171-8.
  7. Park SM, Choi EJ, Cho JJ, Park YG, Kim YS. Public perception of the need for regular family doctors, their major role, and appropriate training duration. Korean J Fam Pract 2013; 3: 124-31.
  8. Lee JH, Kim CH, Kang KS. The opinion of private family practitioners on the family doctor registration program and it’s major services. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2001; 22: 1021-33.
  9. Lee JH, Moon OR, Lee WC, Yoon SJ, Lee B, Jun CS. An analysis of opinion polls for family medicine specialists on the implementation of family doctor registration system in Korea. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1999; 20: 43-54.
  10. Chung JJ, Lee JH, Yoo HM, Cho JJ. Understanding the needs of health care users in the making of a better primary health care system: interview findings on the role of family medicine measurement. Korean J Fam Pract 2013;3: 132-8.

This Article

Author ORCID Information

Social Network Service